Showing posts with label George W Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George W Bush. Show all posts

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Two Constants

There appear to be only two constants in our ever-changing world. One is that Barack Obama is going to be on television every day forever. No venue is too strange. Soon, he’ll be on “Dancing With the Stars” (“And now, doing the Health Care, Energy and Education tango ...”) or delivering the weather report. (“Here we see a wave of systemic change, moving across the nation ...”)



The other immutable truth is that we always need to have somebody we can be really, really angry at. John McCain, George W. Bush, the House Republicans. The A.I.G. bonus-takers have pretty much worn out their 15 minutes. Someone will have to step up to the plate and take their turn.



I don't know for certain, but I suspect there must be a White House department for this.  Someone appointed to target the next distraction/villain to keep the public eye off of the economy and the administration.  Someone to distract us from the ever increasing federal deficit and national debt. Someone to make us forget that we went from a president who stumbled over his words, to one who stumbles over his thoughts without a tele-prompter.



I don't know who this person is, but if he really exists, I'm certain he's cheated on his taxes.

Read more...

Monday, March 2, 2009

Near-Collision with Asteroid

A small asteroid buzzed by Earth today, though only real astronomy geeks in the Pacific would have noticed.



The rock, estimated to be no more than 200 feet wide, zoomed past our planet at an altitude of 40,000 miles at 1:44 p.m. universal time — or 8:44 EST.  Dubbed 2009 DD45, it was discovered only on Friday by Australian astronomers.




Forty thousand miles may sound like a lot, but it's only about one-seventh of the way to the moon, and less than twice as far out as many telecommunication satellites.




Had 2009 DD45 hit the Earth, it would have exploded on or near the surface with the force of a large nuclear blast — not very reassuring when you consider humanity had only about three days' notice.




According to the Australian news Web site Crikey, the asteroid is likely to be drawn in by Earth's gravity, meaning it may return for many more near misses in the future.




Congressional Democrats were mixed in their response.  About half complained that there wasn't enough of a notice to pass an Asteroid tax, while others complained that it was supposed to pass by four months earlier in order to provide another opportunity to blame Bush for something that almost might have wiped us out.

Read more...

Clinton Doubtful About Negotiations with Iran

SHARM EL-SHEIK, Egypt -- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton "expressed doubt" Monday that Iran would respond to the Obama administration's diplomatic initiatives toward Tehran on nuclear and other issues, a senior State Department official said.



Clinton made the statement in a private meeting with the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates, Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who had expressed to Clinton a concern among Persian Gulf nations that Obama might make a deal with Iran without full consultation with U.S. allies. The official who described the exchange spoke on condition of anonymity because the meeting was private.



Of course, PRIOR TO THE ELECTION, Bush was an idiot for suggesting that you can't negotiate with Iran. 



Negotiating with Iran on the issue of nuclear weapons (or any other issue, for that matter) is like trying to negotiate with a 2 year old over a lollipop.  You can talk 'till you're blue in the face, and you might even get a nod of agreement.  But just try and take away the sucker.....


Read more...

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Helicopter hits Obama in the head

Here's something you won't see played over and over in the MainStream Media...

Apparently, Obama was so busy mugging for the cameras when he tried to board Marine One, that he smacked his head on the door of the aircraft. 

Every gaffe made by George W. Bush, whether due to his struggle with words or a clumsy moment (which all of us have, by the way), was replayed over and over on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, the Comedy Channel and the Food Network.  (Okay, I just threw in the last one to make a point.) 

Even going back to Gerald Ford, Republicans have been made fun of for every little thing that wasn't as perfect as The Messiah.  Ford, who was a football player, and apparently not prone to clumsiness, was lampooned during his entire Presidency for one fall.

Images of Bush falling on a Segway or on a bicycle have been replayed so many times on the major networks that hardly anyone in America hasn't seen those clips.

Obama hitting his head on a helicopter, though, now that's a different story.

Too many important things are going on right now.  We have to get that stimulus package passed.  And we have to deal with Gitmo and Iran.  There isn't a place in the media for something this trivial.  Besides, we can't show Obama having a weakness.  That would be un-Messianic. 

Expect a new line item in the stimulus package before it's passed:  Several billion dollars for designing and building a new Marine One with a larger door.

Read more...

Thursday, February 5, 2009

The End of an Era

Now that George W. Bush and the Republicans are out of power and Obama and the Dems are in power, we have witnessed an end to the era of scare-tactic politics.  Remember the Dems accusing President Bush and the Republicans of trying to scare Americans about everything?  Remember?


George W. Bush tried to scare us into a war on Terror.  He said that if we didn't go to war against al-Qaeda that they might attack us again.  They could actually kill people.  How dare Bush scare us like that.

Bush tried to scare us with the Patriot Act, as well.  As if there might be people right here in America that could try to harm people.  Shame on Bush.

And don't forget Gitmo.  Bush claimed that there might be some dangerous people there.  He refused to close it down in the face of criticism by scaring the American people into believing that it might actually contain some dangerous people.  

Aren't we all glad that that's all over with.  I'm glad the Dems and Obama have no intention of using scare tactics for political purposes.


... I guess that's all I have to say about that.




.... Oh, wait.  I also wanted to mention this:  We all need to get behind this stimulus package, because if it isn't passed, we will have the end of the world as we know it.  That's what Obama seems to be saying.  Obama warned on Thursday that failure to act on an economic recovery package could plunge the nation into a long-lasting recession that might prove irreversible, a fresh call to a recalcitrant Congress to move quickly.

In an op-ed piece in The Washington Post, the president argued that each day without his stimulus package, Americans lose more jobs, savings and homes. His message came as congressional leaders struggle to control the huge stimulus bill that's been growing larger by the day in the Senate. The addition of a new tax break for homebuyers Wednesday evening sent the price tag well past $900 billion.

Senate Democratic leaders hope for passage of the legislation by Friday at the latest, although prospects appear to hinge on crafting a series of spending reductions that would make the bill more palatable to centrists in both parties.

Obama painted a bleak picture if lawmakers do nothing.

"This recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse," Obama wrote in the newspaper piece titled, "The Action Americans Need."

He rejected the argument that more tax cuts are needed in the plan and that piecemeal measures would be sufficient, arguing that Americans made their intentions clear in the election.

"I reject these theories, and so did the American people when they went to the polls in November and voted resoundingly for change," he wrote.


I'm glad he's not trying the old scare tactics of Bush.  Fortunately we are now in an era of "Hope".

Read more...

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Bush's Legacy

One week from today will mark the end of George W. Bush’s eight-year presidency. He will leave office with historically low approval numbers, and a significant percentage of Americans would today define the Bush presidency as a failure.  In fact, a quick google search will show that many on the left, instead of rejoicing that their candidate is about to be inaugurated, would rather spend these last few days of the Bush presidency getting in their parting shots.

History will judge President Bush differently. Make no mistake, George W. Bush did not govern as a true conservative. He often infuriated conservatives with profligate spending and unrestrained growth of government, such as the Medicare prescription drug program, signing onto campaign finance reform, and embracing the Democrats’ multi-trillion bailout during the final weeks of his presidency. And his unwillingness to tackle illegal immigration produced much consternation on the right.

But on three political fronts, George W. Bush hit a home run.

First, President Bush won two rounds of tax cuts that allowed all taxpayers, rich and poor, to keep more of their own money, brought in better-than-expected revenue to the federal government, and sparked years of burgeoning economic growth that was only stopped by the Democrat-induced mortgage crisis late last year.

Second, George W. Bush seated two conservatives on the Supreme Court: John Roberts and Samuel Alito. The high court ended up preserving, for example, the partial-birth abortion ban that was passed by the U.S. Congress.

But the defining moment of George W. Bush’s presidency came on September 11, 2001, when the U.S. was savagely attacked by Islamic terrorists who claimed nearly 3,000 American lives, brought down a symbol of American economic power, and took a temporary toll on our economy. After years of ignoring terrorism by his predecessor, George W. Bush’s response with swift and decisive. He resolved that the United States would defeat terrorists and countries that harbored them. What resulted was an overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and an overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the latter being tried by his own people, convicted, and executed.

Thus, two formerly oppressive, terrorist-friendly nations were converted into democracies by the U.S. and its allies.

But, most importantly, in the seven-plus years since 9/11, the U.S. has not suffered another terrorist attack on its own soil. The War on Terrorism was effectively taken overseas and fought on the soil of those who had supported terrorists and their evil mission.

For this, George W. Bush has been savagely maligned by the American left. Liberals have consistently proclaimed military defeat in the presence of actual victory. They have accused the President of war crimes, calling the war illegal, and accusing the U.S. military of torture. They have demanded that we shut down Guantanamo Bay, where we have held militant Islamists as prisoners. In other words, the left has demonstrated greater concern for the rights of terrorists than the rights of Americans.

Thank goodness we have had a President more committed to preserving the lives of Americans than the rights of al Qaeda.

President Clinton proved that you cannot defeat terrorists through diplomacy and appeasement. Terrorists only understand violence and force. And President Bush, armed with the superior might of the U.S. military, has crippled the Taliban and al Qaeda by the aggressive use of force. George W. Bush is the one leader who has given the world a template on how to defeat terrorists. Other leaders and President Bush’s successor would do well to follow that model.

Defeating terrorism was never going to be quick and easy. Fighting terrorists is not the same as fighting another nation. Terrorist cells are scattered, hidden, and transient. Yet President Bush has been stuck with approval ratings in the 20’s and 30’s for much of his second term, owing partly to an impatient electorate, and partly to a media and opposition party determined to ignore our successes, amplify our setbacks, and portray victory as defeat.

But those who shape public opinion today won’t be writing the history of the Bush presidency. That will be left to others, years from now, who will have no vested interest in the success or failure of the Bush presidency, but who will instead be able to clearly see the results of the War on Terrorism. This is why George W. Bush will be ultimately considered far more favorably than he is today. Those who spread freedom usually are. Like it or not, those who dismiss George W. Bush as a bumbling idiot, those who have called for his impeachment, and those who have attempted to orchestrate his political demise owe their safety from Islamic militants to our 43rd President.

Read more...

About This Blog

This blog is about my opinions and world view.  I am a conservative, evangelical Christian.  Generally speaking, if you post a comment, I'll allow you to express your view.  However, if you say something hateful, untruthful, or just generally something I don't like, I may remove it.

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP