Media Hit Piece on Glenn Beck

Oh the irony.

Time magazine's hit piece on Glenn Beck, asking if he is bad for America, was released last week, just as the ACORN videos hit the airwaves. Even more ironic is that the authors of the smear are just as guilty as Beck when it comes to trying to garner readers and attention.

Time considers Beck to be a populist who's cashing in on the frustration of America. At least that much they got right. He is. That being said, I'm glad he's doing it. Someone has to.

There was nothing stopping the leftist media from investigating ACORN, Van Jones, the Lies about the Health Care proposals in Congress, the Czars, the Bailouts, TARP funds, and the rest of the corruption swirling around Washington.

The shame is that Time wastes its time asking if Beck is bad for America, rather than asking if Obama's policies and advisors are bad for America. Or ACORN. Or the Marxists in Congress. Isn't that their job?

Although the leftist media has openly mocked Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, bloggers, radio talk show hosts and every American who has openly expressed concern over the policies of this administration, we've been effective. The White House and Congress are starting to realize they can run roughshod over ever ideal America holds dear without consequences.

No wonder Time thinks Beck is dangerous. He's dangerous to their agenda. It's no wonder they are going after bloggers. They are cutting into Time's profit margins.

Read more...

The Boycott Against Glenn Beck Will Backfire

Glenn Beck, the conservative commentator and star of one of the most successful shows on Fox News, is under attack. And as Rush Limbaugh has repeatedly proved, under attack is the best place for a conservative commentator to be. It allows the blusterer to play victim – and it gives a savvy spin doctor a chance to rile up his base.

First, let’s get you up to speed. Last month, Glenn Beck told the hosts of Fox & Friends that President Barack Obama has a “deep-seated hatred for white people.” That statement apparently wasn’t explicit enough, so Beck made sure everyone understood his point: “This guy is, I believe, a racist,” he said.

Plenty of folks on the left have accused Beck of treason for his comments. But let’s give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume his internal filtering mechanism was temporarily disabled. What is the appropriate response to that kind of rhetoric? For his part, Bill Shine, Fox’s senior vice president of programming, told TVNewser that Beck had expressed a “personal opinion which represented his own views, not those of the Fox News Channel.”

But that wasn’t enough for some of Beck’s advertisers, who began this week to pull spots from “The Glenn Beck Program.” Among the companies that removed advertising were Progressive, Geico, Radio Shack and Roche. Meanwhile, a political group called ColorOfChange.org is circulating a petition, asking consumers to boycott Beck’s show.

“Beck is on a campaign to convince the American public that President Obama’s agenda is about serving the needs of Black communities at White people’s expense. It’s repulsive, divisive and shouldn’t be on the air. Join us in calling on Beck’s advertisers to stop sponsoring his show,” the petition reads.

What Beck's detractors forget is that controversy increases ratings.

And, ultimately, that's why these attacks against Beck will backfire. Few people knew who Don Imus was until he made his "nappy haired ho's" comment. Relatively few, anyway. Now, everybody knows who Don Imus is. Even though Imus lost his job, he's more popular than ever. Howard Stern (who I consider to be a complete degenerate) has built an industry shocking people. The more outrageous he became, the bigger his program.

To be sure, most Fox News hosts aren't really that controversial. Yes, the left considers O'Reilly, Hannity and others to be radical extremists. But they've built their audience, not on controversy, but more on presenting news stories and commentary from a viewpoint more consistent with the majority of Americans.

Beck takes a different approach. Rush Limbaugh occasionally says that he illustrates the absurd by being absurd (or something to that effect). This is what Beck does. He's a little off-beat and quirky. His views are perhaps a little off-kilter, even for the majority of the Fox audience. But he is entertaining, cute, and makes a lot of sense. Add to those attributes "controversial" and you have a can't lose combination.

Read more...