Wednesday, May 6, 2009

An Issue of Freedom of Speech

Isn't it amazing how freedom of speech works in this country?

If you are a liberal and are speaking "politically correctly," what you say is okay, regardless of how uninformed you may be, how false you may be, and regardless of whom it may hurt.  Just be sure you are a liberal.

If you are not a liberal and you say something that is true, then the party of tolerance will start cursing, attacking and smearing you in any way it can.

By now, unless you've been stranded on a deserted island for the past month, you already know that Miss California, Carrie Prejean, answered a question in a fairly polite and honest manner, but with a viewpoint that liberals don't like.  The smear campaign began.

This week, some rather innocent and innocuous photos of Miss Prejean have emerged on the internet. These are being disseminated in a further attempt to smear her and malign her views. It seems the left will stop at nothing to destroy someone who isn't on the "correct" side of an issue. These photos are not in bad taste. In fact, you can find more revealing photos on your local grocery store magazine rack within arms reach of any 12 year old walking by. But suddenly, Miss Prejean is somehow immoral and hypocritical for believing that marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Well, as long as we are talking about hypocrisy, where are these same people when Obama, Hillary and all the other liberals who ran for president distanced themselves from the gay marriage issue? In fact, every candidate who ran (that I'm aware of) officially declared that they opposed same sex marriages.

Here is the difference: Miss Prejean is (1) not liberal (2) a Christian (3) pretty (4) lacking a microphone to fight back.  In other words, she is fair game. Others may enjoy freedom of speech. But the homosexual sodomite crowd will not be happy until Miss California has been dethroned and executed.


2 comments:

James' Muse May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM  

1. I agree that smearing her is way out of line.

2. The photo issue, however, is that she was a)underage 7 b)it was a contractual breach for the beauty pageant. It says she can't have posed nude or semi-nude before.

3. Perez Hilton is a tool.

Thuyen Tran May 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM  

"2. The photo issue, however, is that she was a)underage 7 b)it was a contractual breach for the beauty pageant. It says she can't have posed nude or semi-nude before."

The question is does the folks at MISS USA consider that semi-nude or nude if it was done on covers of SI, which is freequent. Somehow, I suspect the answer is no.

She showed more skin at the pageant then the pictures I have seen so far.

About This Blog

This blog is about my opinions and world view.  I am a conservative, evangelical Christian.  Generally speaking, if you post a comment, I'll allow you to express your view.  However, if you say something hateful, untruthful, or just generally something I don't like, I may remove it.

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP